Edoardo Zoni (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)
MOP6322
Status of Osprey: A Framework for Agentic AI in Control Systems
385
Operating large-scale scientific facilities requires coordinating diverse subsystems, translating operator intent into precise hardware actions, and maintaining strict safety oversight. Language-model agents offer a natural interface for these tasks, but most existing approaches are not yet reliable or safe enough for production use. We introduce Osprey, a framework that wraps a coding agent in a control-room operator interface, a tool surface that reaches hardware through pluggable connectors for the control system used in our community, and a first-class component for natural-language search of facility electronic logbooks. The agent itself is treated as a replaceable component: operator interface, safety policy, tool servers, and connectors stay under facility control, while the agent backend can be swapped as the AI ecosystem evolves. A declarative build-profile mechanism lets each facility maintain its own configuration without forking the shared framework, keeping deployments reproducible across updates. Osprey has been deployed at several DOE accelerator facilities through the MOAT seed effort within the Genesis~Mission. This paper presents the current framework architecture and reports on the substantial evolution Osprey has undergone over the past year.
  • T. Hellert, A. Wu, A. Sulc, A. Huebl, E. Zoni, G. Martino, J. Vay, K. Iliev, R. Lehe, S. Leemann
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • A. Carpenter
    Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
  • C. Xu, H. Shang, M. Smith
    Argonne National Laboratory
  • N. Kuklev
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • N. Wang
    Cornell University
  • Z. Zhang
    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Paper: MOP6322
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2026-MOP6322
About:  Received: 17 May 2026 — Revised: 22 May 2026 — Issue date: 22 May 2026
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
MOP6324
Agentic AI as a Middle Layer for Accelerator Control: Multi-Facility Deployment and Early Results
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are emerging as a practical middle layer for intelligent, self-optimizing accelerator operations. Building on work at the Advanced Light Source, we have developed a modular agentic framework that integrates natural-language interfaces with control systems, archival data, simulation tools, and technical documentation, enabling context-aware reasoning with human-in-the-loop execution. This approach provides intuitive access to complex accelerator environments while preserving safety, transparency, and reproducibility. A central focus of the framework is usability and rapid onboarding. Self-contained tutorials, reproducible deployment patterns, and a facility-agnostic interface allow laboratories to adopt agentic workflows with minimal customization. This streamlined process has supported deployments at APS, SLAC, SNS, CEBAF, ALS, and BELLA as part of a DOE/MOAT effort within the Genesis mission, where agents execute multi-step tasks, generate inspectable plans, and analyze historical and live data through a shared language interface. This contribution presents the core architecture, cross-facility deployment experience, and early operational lessons from these implementations. It also outlines how agentic workflows form a unifying layer for emerging capabilities, such as physics-informed optimizers, reinforcement-learning agents, and automated tuning assistants, advancing autonomous control in next-generation scientific facilities.
  • T. Hellert, A. Sulc, A. Huebl, C. Mitchell, E. Zoni, G. Martino, J. Vay, J. Qiang, R. Lehe, S. Leemann
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • A. Carpenter, C. Tennant, J. Samari, M. Schram
    Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
  • A. Edelen, D. Ratner, R. Roussel, Z. Zhang
    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • C. Xu, H. Shang, N. Schwarz, P. Piot, R. Sainju, S. Habib
    Argonne National Laboratory
  • H. Hoschauer, J. Jarvis, N. Kuklev
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • K. Brown, M. Li, N. Urban
    Brookhaven National Laboratory
  • M. Smith
    Advanced Photon Source
  • W. Blokland
    Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
MOP6394
Progress in the development of the community Particle Accelerator Language Standard (PALS)
469
The Particle Accelerator Language Standard (PALS) is a community effort to create an open standard to promote lattice information exchange for particle accelerators. PALS development is a community-wide international effort involving accelerator physicists from multiple institutions. While it started as a lattice standard for beam dynamics simulations, it is now being extended to support other particle accelerator activities, in particular accelerator operation. With new accelerators that are becoming more complex, larger collaborations and the increasing imprint of artificial intelligence in all accelerator activities (from design to operation to workforce development), the imperative for a common, standardized accelerator ontology has been transitioning from “nice-to-have” to “must-have”. We will present the status of the project, its relations to other projects, including to two of the particle accelerator projects of the newly announced US DOE Genesis Mission: the Multi-Office Accelerator Team (MOAT) project and the Nuclear physics AI-Ready Accelerator Data (NARAD) project.
  • A. Brynes
    Science and Technology Facilities Council
  • A. Edelen, R. Roussel
    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • A. Huebl, C. Mitchell, E. Zoni, J. Vay, J. Qiang, T. Hellert
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • C. Tennant, H. Zhang, T. Satogata
    Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
  • D. Kallendorf
    Technical University of Darmstadt
  • D. Winklehner
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • D. Bruhwiler
    RadiaSoft (United States)
  • D. Sagan
    Cornell University (CLASSE)
  • E. Valetov
    Michigan State University
  • K. Brown, W. Lin
    Brookhaven National Laboratory
  • L. Deniau
    European Organization for Nuclear Research
  • N. Kuklev
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • Y. El Hayek
    GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research
  • Y. Hao
    Facility for Rare Isotope Beams
  • Z. Brencic
    Jožef Stefan Institute
Paper: MOP6394
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2026-MOP6394
About:  Received: 14 May 2026 — Revised: 15 May 2026 — Issue date: 22 May 2026
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
MOV6302
Overview of the US DOE Multi-Office particle Accelerator Team (MOAT) project
: On November 24, 2025, the U.S. government launched the Genesis Mission (https://genesis.energy.gov/), a national mission to accelerate science through artificial intelligence. As part of Genesis, the US DOE Multi-Office particle Accelerator Team (MOAT) project is a bold and cross-cutting effort to leverage the power of AI at DOE’s current and future particle accelerator facilities. MOAT’s overarching goal is to fundamentally transform how particle accelerators are operated, optimized, and designed by connecting data, expertise, and innovation across the DOE complex. It will ensure DOE’s particle accelerator facilities are at the forefront of AI-enabled scientific infrastructure, and that next-generation accelerators achieve unprecedented performance, efficiency, scientific, and societal impact. We will present the project in the context of the Genesis Mission, its goals, methods and deliverables, and discuss its relationships to other projects and activities in the U.S. and abroad.
  • J. Vay, A. Huebl, C. Mitchell, E. Zoni, J. Qiang, R. Lehe, T. Hellert
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • A. Edelen, D. Ratner, R. Roussel, Z. Zhang
    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • C. Tennant, M. Schram
    Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
  • J. Jarvis
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • K. Brown, M. Li, N. Urban
    Brookhaven National Laboratory
  • N. Schwarz, P. Piot, S. Habib
    Argonne National Laboratory
  • W. Blokland
    Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
WEV1301
Accelerator Design Educational Primer – Conceptualizing and Optimizing the Hybrid LHeC-like Electron-Ion Collider Design
3351
The Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) Mission Need requires √s = 20–100 GeV (upgradable to 140 GeV) and luminosity 10³³–10³⁴ cm⁻² s⁻¹. The current ring-ring baseline achieves the full scope, including ~10³⁴ cm⁻² s⁻¹ across all energies. However, when the design is re-optimized for the lower boundary — accepting ~10³³ cm⁻² s⁻¹ and prioritizing cost — an alternative configuration emerges as more advantageous: a hybrid LHeC-like electron accelerator using multi-pass energy recovery linacs (ERL). This solution reduces electron-beam power by roughly an order of magnitude, yielding nearly a factor of two reduction in total project cost compared with the present baseline while still satisfying the minimum physics requirements. The study performs parametric cost and performance modeling, augmented by AI-driven optimization, to explore this design space. Serving primarily as an educational exercise for the next generation of accelerator physicists and engineers, the paper demonstrates modern design methods: rapid parametric scans, cost-driven optimization, and integration of AI tools. It examines technical feasibility, identifies critical R&D (high-current ERL operation, beam–beam effects, synchronization, etc.), and discusses how such re-optimization studies can be used to train designers in an era when artificial intelligence dramatically expands exploration of complex accelerator parameter spaces.
  • A. Seryi, L. van Riesen-Haupt
    Old Dominion University
  • A. Formenti, A. Huebl, C. Mitchell, E. Zoni, J. Vay, J. Qiang, R. Lehe
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • C. Lindstrøm
    University of Oslo
  • L. Vanhecke, T. Pieloni
    École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Paper: WEV1301
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2026-WEV1301
About:  Received: 12 May 2026 — Revised: 19 May 2026 — Accepted: 22 May 2026 — Issue date: 22 May 2026
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote